Announced October 12, 2026 · not shipping yet
USFP, the 6.4T pluggable for AI networks
Cisco and NVIDIA want the next generation of optical modules to run 400 Gb/s on every electrical lane, in a module the size of today's OSFP. This site tracks what has really been published, what hasn't, and how USFP stacks up against OSFP, XPO and co-packaged optics.
- Lanes
- 16 to 32
- Per lane
- 400 Gb/s
- Per module
- 6.4T to 12.8T
- Heat
- 100 W max
Four times the bandwidth in one port's space
Today's fastest pluggables, the 1.6T OSFP modules going into AI clusters now, carry eight lanes of 200 Gb/s. USFP doubles the lane rate to 400 Gb/s and doubles the lane count to 16, which is where the 4x claim comes from: 6.4T through a front-panel opening about the size of one OSFP port.
A 32-lane version takes a single module to 12.8T. The companies also claim about 1.3 times the power efficiency of 200G-per-lane optics, a figure no one outside Cisco and NVIDIA has measured yet (NAND Research).
One USFP module, first generation
16 lanes × 400 Gb/s = 6.4 Tb/s each way, or four 1.6T ports
Status tracker
Where USFP stands today
An announcement isn't a product. Here is every step between the press release and a module you can put on a purchase order, and which ones have happened. We re-check it at least monthly; last on October 17, 2026.
- Announced by Cisco and NVIDIA October 12, 2026
- Connector and cage partners named October 12, 2026
- Multi-source agreement formed Not yet
- Specification published Not yet
- 400G-per-lane switch silicon announced Not yet
- Module samples shown Not yet
- Switches or SuperNICs with USFP ports announced Not yet
- Modules you can order Not yet
Checked October 17, 2026. 2 of 8 steps done.
How much each format carries
USFP is one of five ways the industry is trying to get optics past 1.6T per port. They differ in where the optics sit, how they're cooled and whether a technician can pull one out of a running switch.
- OSFP 1.6T
- OSFP-XD 3.2T
- USFP 6.4T to 12.8T
- Open CPX 7.2T
- XPO 12.8T to 25.6T
USFP vs OSFP
Same footprint, four times the bandwidth, a new connector. Why your OSFP cages won't take it.
USFP vs XPO
Air-friendly 6.4T against a liquid-cooled 12.8T. Two camps, two bets on the next switch chip.
USFP vs co-packaged optics
Keep swappable modules, or put the optics in the switch package for the lowest power.
Every form factor
OSFP to co-packaged optics in one table: lanes, capacity, heat and who backs each.
Does it save a tier in your fabric?
The real argument for 400G lanes isn't the module, it's the switch behind it. Double the lane rate and a switch chip of the same size has twice the 1.6T ports, so a cluster that needed three tiers of switches can fit in two. Fewer tiers means fewer switches, fewer optics and less latency.
Put in your endpoint count and port speed and the calculator shows the switches, links and pluggable ends on today's 102.4T chips and on a 204.8T, 400G-per-lane chip.
- 4,096 endpoints at 1.6T on a 102.4T switch
- 3 tiers
- The same cluster on a 204.8T, 400G-per-lane switch
- 2 tiers
Non-blocking leaf-spine maths. A 102.4T chip has 64 ports of 1.6T (up to 2,048 endpoints in two tiers); a 204.8T chip has 128 (up to 8,192).
Get one email when USFP is real
Nothing to buy yet and no spec to read. Leave your work email and we'll write once, the day the specification is published or a maker announces modules, with what changed.